WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Proton Technologies AG v. Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot Case No. DCO2019-0008 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Proton Technologies AG of Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland, internally represented, Switzerland.

The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot of San Mateo, California, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 4, 2019. On March 5, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On March 6, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on March 7, 2019 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on March 7, 2019. In response to a notification by the Center that the Complaint was administratively deficient, the Complainant filed a second amended Complaint on March 12, 2019.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on March 13, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was April 2, 2019. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on April 3, 2019.

The Center appointed Desmond J. Ryan as the sole panelist in this matter on April 11, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

According to the evidence filed by the Complainant, the Complainant is a Swiss Corporation which provides a secure email service under the trade mark PROTON MAIL. It is the owner of trade mark registrations prominently including “Proton Mail” in the United States, the European Union and Switzerland. The Complainant commenced its operation under the PROTON MAIL trade mark in May 2014.

The disputed domain name was registered on December 21, 2018, it does not currently resolve to an active website, however, according to evidence provided by the Complainant as at March 2019, it directed to other email providers and encryption services operating in competition to the Complainant. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

The Complainant’s contentions may be summarised as follows:

- The Complainant’s name and trade mark PROTON MAIL have been widely known and recognized and promoted from a time four years prior to the creation of the disputed domain name,

- The disputed domain n