WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Steinbach Credit Union Limited v. Vietname Domain Privacy Services / Pham Dinh Nhut Case No. D2019-0509 1. The Parties

Complainant is Steinbach Credit Union Limited of Steinbach, Manitoba, Canada, represented by MLT Aikins LLP, Canada.

Respondent is Vietname Domain Privacy Services of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Name / Pham Dinh Nhut of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with April Sea Information Technology Corporation (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 5, 2019. On March 5, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Domain Name. On March 8, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the Domain Name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to Complainant on March 11, 2019 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. Complainant filed an amended Complaint on March 16, 2019.

On March 11, 2019, the Center sent an email in English and Vietnamese to the Parties regarding the language of the proceeding. Complainant requested that English be the language of the proceeding on March 14, 2019. Respondent did not comment on the language of the proceeding by the specified due date.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified Respondent in English and Vietnamese of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on March 19, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was April 8, 2019. Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified Respondent’s default on April 9, 2019. On April 16, 2019, Respondent submitted an informal email asking about the status of the proceeding.

The Center appointed Robert A. Badgley as the sole panelist in this matter on April 23, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

Complainant is a credit union in Canada, and has been operating for more than 70 years. Complainant holds various registered trademarks, including Canadian Registration No. TMA577727 for the mark SCU STEINBACH CREDIT UNION, registered on March 20, 2003.

The Domain Name was registered on June 9, 2004. The Domain Name resolves to a very rudimentary website which contains seven hyperlinks, such as “Credit Union Bank,” “Credit Union,” and “Rbc Canada”. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

Complainant asserts that it has established the three elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the Domain Name. B. Respondent

Respondent has not replied to Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings 6.1 Language of Proceedings

Paragraph 11(a) of the Rules provides that “unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, or specified otherwise in the Registration Agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the Registration Agreement, subject to the authority of the Panel