WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Calvin Klein Trademark Trust & Calvin Klein, Inc. v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico Case No. D2019-0333 1. The Parties

The Complainants are Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and Calvin Klein, Inc. of New York, New York, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Kestenberg Siegal Lipkus LLP, Canada.

The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, of Panama City, Panama. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with GoD, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on February 12, 2019. On February 13, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On February 13, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on February 14, 2019, providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on February 14, 2019.

The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on February 15, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was March 7, 2019. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on March 8, 2019.

The Center appointed Marilena Comanescu as the sole panelist in this matter on March 13, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.

The language of the proceeding is English. 4. Factual Background

The Complainant has a long established worldwide reputation in the production, sale, and licensing of men’s and women’s apparel, fragrances, accessories, and footwear using the CALVIN KLEIN mark.

The Complainant has a large portfolio of registrations for the CALVIN KLEIN mark in the United States and worldwide including:

- the United States Trademark CALVIN KLEIN , registration number 1,633,261, registered on January 29, 1991, for goods in IC 25, and
- the United States Trademark CALVIN KLEIN, registration number 1,086,041, registered on February 21, 1978, for goods in IC 25.

The Complainant holds and uses a number of Internet domain name registrations which wholly incorporate the CALVIN KLEIN mark, including: , , , and .

Previous panels have found that the Complainant’s mark has acquired an extensive and worldwide reputation and has become well known. See Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, Calvin Klein Inc. v. Camille Walters,WIPO Case No. D2018-1107, and cases cited therein.

The disputed domain name was registered on November 30, 2018, and, according to the evidence provided in the Complaint, it was used in connection with a Chrome-extension download page, which contains links to various pages and potentially dangerous content.

Before commencing the present procedure, on December 3, 2018, the Complainant sent a letter to the Respondent asking for the voluntarily transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant.

The Respondent, Carolina Rodrigues, has been involved in numerous past UDRP disputes, decided against it. See for example, The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v. Domains By Proxy, LLC DomainsByP / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2018-2348, The British United Prov