WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Amissima Assicurazioni S.p.A. and Amissima Vita S.p.A., v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0152823533 / Ada De Francia Case No. D2019-0148 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Amissima Assicurazioni S.p.A of Milan, Italy and Amissima Vita S.p.A. of Genoa, Italy, represented by Perani Pozzi Associati - Studio Legale, Italy.

The Respondent is Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0152823533 of Toronto, Ontario, Canada /

Ada De Francia of Palmi, Italy. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on January 23, 2019. On January 23, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On January 23, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on January 24, 2019 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on January 28, 2019.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on January 29, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was February 18, 2019. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on February 22, 2019.

The Center appointed Eva Fiammenghi as the sole panelist in this matter on March 5, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

The Complainants Amissima Assicurazioni S.p.A. and Amissima Vita S.p.A. are part of the Amissima Insurance Group.

The first one, Amissima Assicurazioni S.p.A. operates in the field of assets and people protection, providing services to families and small/medium enterprises while the second operates in the field of social security and savings protection, making use of its shareholders’ wide experience for managing investments and distributing its insurance products.

The Complainants are the owners, among others, of the following registrations for the trademarks:

- AMISSIMA European Union Trademark Registrations (“EUTM”) Registration. No. 014711675 registered on February 8, 2016, in classes 35, 36 and 38,

- AMISSIMA Italy Registration No. 302015000028093 registered on February 5, 2016, in classes 35, 36 and 38,

- AMISSIMA asset management & insurance solutions - EUTM Registration No. 014711709, registered on December 16, 2016 in classes 35, 36 and 38,

- AMISSIMA asset management & insurance solutions” Italy - Registration No. 302015000033700, registered on June 19, 2017 in class 36.

Moreover, the Complainants are also the owners, among the others, of the domain names:

The disputed domain name was registered on October 1, 2018. At the time the Complaint was filed the disputed domain name resolved to an inactive site. Prior to the Complaint, the disputed domain name connected to a website reproducing the Complainants’ trademark and business name, in which the Respondent offered insurance services for cars. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

The Complainants argue that the disputed domain name is almost identical to the Complainants’ trademarks and domain names.

The disputed domain name reproduces exactly the Complainants trademarks and domain names.

The Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant and there is no evidence to suggest that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name to advance legitimate interests.

The Complainant has never licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to