WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Closed Holding GmbH v. Name Redacted Case No. D2019-0047 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Closed Holding GmbH of Hamburg, Germany, represented by Nesselhauf Rechtsanwälte, Germany.

The Respondent is Name Redacted.1 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with GoD, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on January 9, 2019. On January 9, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Disputed Domain Name. On January 10, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on January 11, 2019 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on January 14, 2019.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on January 21, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was February 10, 2019. The Respondent did not submit any formal response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Parties about the commencement of panel appointment process.

The Center appointed Pablo A. Palazzi as the sole panelist in this matter on February 13, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

The Complainant is a German company which offers and distributes clothing.

The Complainant is the owner of, inter alia, the European Union Trademark CLOSED Registration No. 000298406, registered on November 26, 1999.

Moreover, the Complainant operates an online shop under the domain name .

The Disputed Domain Name was registered on March 28, 2018.

The Disputed Domain Name resolves to an online shop which offers clothes. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar

The Complainant alleges that the Disputed Domain Name consist of its trademark CLOSED combined with the terms “outlet” and “online shop”. Thus, these additions do not prevent the existence of confusing similarity between the Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s trademark.

The Complainant states that Internet users will be misled to believe that the website is operated by the Complainant. Rights or legitimate interests

The Complainant submits that the Respondent has no license agreement or any other right or legitimate interest that could justify the use of the Disputed Domain Name.

In addition, the Complainant states that the online shop evokes the impression to be the official outlet store of the Complainant.

The Complainant alleges that the Respondent created the website to lure users in making payment to an unknown party while putting their trust in the good name of the Complainant. Registration and use in bad faith

The Complainant alleges that the Respondent intentionally attempted and attempts to attra