WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Coloplast A/S v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1242178062 / Hillary Washington Case No. D2018-2372 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Coloplast A/S of Humlebaek, Denmark, represented internally.

The Respondent is Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1242178062 of Toronto, Ontario, Canada / Hillary Washington, Coloplast of Los Angeles, California, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with Google Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on October 17, 2018. On October 18, 2018, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names. On October 19, 2018, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response:

(a) it is the Registrar for the disputed domain name,

(b) disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint,

(d) the language of the registration agreement is English,

(e) the disputed domain name was registered subject to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), and the UDRP applies to the disputed domain name.

The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on October 29, 2018 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on November 16, 2018.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on November 28, 2018. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was December 18, 2018. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on December 20, 2018.

The Center appointed Warwick A. Rothnie as the sole panelist in this matter on January 9, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

According to the Complaint (and its annexes), the Complainant has been producing and distributing medical devices in the fields of ostomy care, urology, and continence care for over 60 years under or by reference to the trademark COLOPLAST. It conducts its operations under this trademark in many countries through subsidiaries incorporated for that purpose. Amongst other things, it promotes its products and services by reference to “Coloplast” from websites associated with the domain names and numerous others registered in country code Top-Level Domains (“ccTLDs”), such as , , , and .

The Complainant is the owner of an International Registration for the trademark COLOPLAST, Registration No. 883011, which was registered on May 26, 2005 in respect of relevant goods in International Classes 3, 5 and 10. This trademark designates numerous countries.

In the United States, the Complainant owns at least United States Registered Trademark Nos 1,603,298 and 1,303,362, both for COLOPLAST. Trademark No. 1,303,362 was registered on November 6, 1984 and is registered in respect of relevant goods in International Classes 3, 5, and 10, Trademark No. 1,603,298 includes also a figurative element of a circle with stripes. It was registered on June 26, 1990 in respect of relevant goods in International Classes 3, 5, and 10.

The disputed domain name was registered on January 23, 2018. So far as the record shows, the disputed domain name has not resolved to any active website. No records have been retrieved for any website at the disputed domain name by the Wayback Machine. 5. Discussion and Findings

No response has been filed. The Complaint has been sent, however, to the Respondent at the physical and electronic coordinates specified in the WhoIs record as confirmed by the Registrar in accordance with paragraph 2(a) of the Rules. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Respondent has been given a fair opportunity to present his or her case.

When a respondent has defaulted, paragrap