WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Schibsted Classified Media Hungary v. Vietnam Domain Privacy Services Case No. D2018-1618 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Schibsted Classified Media Hungary of Budapest, Hungary, represented by Nóra Nagy-Baranyi, Hungary.

The Respondent is Vietnam Domain Privacy Services of Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with April Sea Information Technology Corporation (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on July 18, 2018. On July 18, 2018, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On July 27, 2018, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details. In response to a notification by the Center that the Complaint was administratively deficient, the Complainant cured the deficiency on August 8, 2018. On August 13, 2018, the Center notified the Parties in both English and Vietnamese that the language of the Registration Agreement for the disputed domain name was Vietnamese. On August 16, 2018, the Complainant requested for English to be the language of the proceeding, to which the Respondent did not reply.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint in both Vietnamese and English, and the proceedings commenced on August 20, 2018. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was September 9, 2018. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on September 10, 2018.

The Center appointed Douglas Clark as the sole panelist in this matter on September 19, 2018. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

The Complainant is the registrant of the domain name and since 1999 has also owned and operated the “www.” website where classified advertisements for cars are published and edited into a searchable online database and which is now a significant platform in Hungary for the trade in used cars.

The Complainant is registered under the corporate name of Használtautó Ltd and is the owner of the Hungarian trademarks HASZNÁLTAUTÓ (Reg. No. 187831, filed on December 12, 2005 and registered on December 14, 2006) and HASZNÁLTAUTÓ.HU (Reg. No. 188321, filed on May 17, 2004 and registered on January 12, 2007).

The Respondent is a privacy service in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. The Registrar has confirmed that the Privacy Service is the registrant of the disputed domain name.

The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on April 6, 2005. The disputed domain name resolves to a website “www.” which appears to be a parking page containing hyperlinks in the Hungarian language to car trading websites. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

The Complainant’s contentions are as follows:

Identical or confusingly similar

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the HASZNÁLTAUTÓ and HASZNÁLTAUTÓ.HU trademarks because it incorporates in its entirety the HASZNÁLTAUTÓ trademark with only the addition of the letter “k”, which signifies the plural form of a noun in the Hungarian language.

No rights or legitimate interests

The Respondent (as an individual, business, or other organization) owns no trademarks in “hasznaltautok” and is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, which resolves to a website with hyperlinks in the Hungarian language to other websites offering similar services to the Complainant. This shows that the Respondent is not making a legitimate, noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name, without intent or commercial gain misleadingly to divert.

The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith

The website to which the disputed domain name resolves shows that the Respondent