WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Indivior UK Limited v. Xu Jing Case No. D2018-1302 1. The Parties

The Complainant is Indivior UK Limited of Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Troutman Sanders, LLP, United States.

The Respondent is Xu Jing of Beijing, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on June 11, 2018. On the same day, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On June 12, 2018, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response providing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on June 15, 2018 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar. On the same day, the Complainant filed an amended Complaint.

On June 15, 2018, the Center sent an email in English and Chinese to the Parties regarding the language of the proceeding. The Complainant requested that English be the language of the proceeding on June 19, 2018. The Respondent did not comment on the language of the proceeding.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent in English and Chinese of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on June 25, 2018. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was July 15, 2018. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on July 16, 2018.

The Center appointed Matthew Kennedy as the sole panelist in this matter on July 19, 2018. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

The Complainant is a pharmaceutical company that, along with its affiliates, sells pharmaceuticals for addiction treatment and control. It owns trademark registrations for INDIVIOR in multiple jurisdictions including Chinese trademark registration number G1214595, registered on June 27, 2014, specifying goods and services in classes 5, 10, and 44 including pharmaceutical preparations, medical apparatus, and medical services. That trademark registration remains current. The Complainant has also registered the domain name that it uses in connection with its official website where it provides information about itself and its products.

The Respondent is an individual ostensibly resident in China. His contact street address in the Registrar’s WhoIs database is manifestly false. The disputed domain name was registered on May 4, 2018. It does not resolve to any active website, rather, it is passively held. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the INDIVIOR trademark because it incorporates that mark in its entirety without change.

The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The INDIVIOR mark is a coined, fanciful term which has no meaning outside its use as a means to identify the Complainant as a source of certain products and services. The Respondent is not a licensee of the Complainant nor is the Respondent otherwise authorized to use the INDIVIOR trademark for any purpose. Upon information and belief, the Respondent is not commonly known as “Indivior”. The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.

The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Upon information and belief, the Respondent knowingly registered the disputed domain name, a near-exact reproduction of the Complainant’s unique and inherently distinctive INDIVIOR trademark. There is no plausible circumstance under which the Respondent could legitimately register or use the disputed domain name. B. Respondent

The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings 6.1 Language of the Proceeding

Paragraph 11(a) of the Rules provides that “unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, or specified otherwise in the Registration Agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the Registration Agreement, subject to the authority of the Panel to determine otherwise, having regard to the circumstances