WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. v. Oscar Dominguez, GSG Group Case No. D2018-1093 1. The Parties

Complainant is Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.

Respondent is Oscar Dominguez, GSG Group of Los Angeles, California, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name, , is registered with GoD, LLC ("Registrar"). 3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ("Center") on May 16, 2018. On May 16, 2018, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On May 17, 2018, the Registrar responded by email verifying that Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact information and other details of the registration.

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("Supplemental Rules").

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on May 29, 2018. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was June 18, 2018. Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified Respondent's default on June 19, 2018.

The Center appointed Debra J. Stanek as the sole panelist in this matter on June 21, 2018. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background

Complainant is a professional services and investment management firm specializing in real estate. It owns a number of registrations for the mark JLL, including a United States federal registration for JLL for various services related to real estate (Reg No. 4,564,654) which issued July 8, 2014. It also uses the domain name for its website.

Respondent registered the disputed domain name on January 29, 2018. The disputed domain name directs to a web page parked by the Registrar.

Complainant objected to Respondent's registration in email communications sent in February and March 2018. According to the Complaint, Complainant did not receive a response. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's JLL mark, which is registered and used in a number of jurisdictions throughout the world, including the United States and Latin America.

The disputed domain name differs from Complainant's JLL mark only with the added generic, descriptive term "Latino". Because the JLL mark is so closely associated with Complainant, this addition only increases the similarity between the name and the mark – particularly in light of Complainant's offices in Latin America. Rights or Legitimate Interests

Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.

Respondent is not sponsored by or affiliated with Complainant in any way.

Complainant has not given authorized Respondent to use Complainant's trademarks in any manner, including in a domain name.