MIHUȚ v. ROMANIA

 
 
 
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
This version was rectified on 26 April 2019
under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court.
 
Application no. 16506/16
Augustin MIHUȚ
against Romania
 
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17 January 2019 as a Committee composed of:
Georges Ravarani, President,
Marko Bošnjak,
Péter Paczolay, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 July 2016,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 7 February 2019.
Liv TigerstedtGeorges Ravarani
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident


 
 
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention)
 
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Date of birth
 
Representative’s name and location
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)[1]   
16506/16
22/07/2016
Augustin Mihuț
30/07/1956[2]
Augustin-Viorel Țigan
Ceica
06/06/2018
06/12/2018
3,000
 
[1].  Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
[2].  Rectified on 26 April 2019: the text was: 30/06/1956

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy