CASE OF JEAN-JACQUES MOREL AGAINST FRANCE AND 7 OTHER CASES

Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)88
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Eight cases against France
 
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 April 2019 at the 1344th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
 
 
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
25689/10
JEAN-JACQUES MOREL
10/10/2013
10/01/2014
29369/10
MORICE
23/04/2015
Grand Chamber
40454/07
COUDERC AND HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES
10/11/2015
Grand Chamber
29024/11
BONO
15/12/2015
15/03/2016
29313/10
DE CAROLIS AND FRANCE TELEVISIONS
21/01/2016
21/04/2016
50147/11
REICHMAN
12/07/2016
12/10/2016
41519/12
LACROIX
07/09/2017
07/12/2017
41841/12
OTTAN
19/04/2018
19/07/2018
 
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
 
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
 
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
 
-          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
-          of general measures preventing similar violations;
 
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
 
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)303);
 
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
 
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
 
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy