CASE OF AKHUNDOV AGAINST AZERBAIJAN AND 12 OTHER CASES

Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)140
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Thirteen cases against Azerbaijan
 
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 June 2019 at the 1348th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
 
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
39941/07
AKHUNDOV
03/02/2011
03/05/2011
19276/08
ANDREYEVA
18/12/2012
18/12/2012
51920/09
BAKHSHIYEV AND OTHERS
03/05/2012
03/05/2012
31556/03
EFENDIYEVA
25/10/2007
11/12/2008
25/01/2008
11/03/2009
38798/07
GULMAMMADOVA
22/04/2010
22/07/2010
50766/07+
HAJIYEVA AND OTHERS
08/07/2010
08/10/2010
50757/07
HASANOV
22/04/2010
22/07/2010
50711/07+
ISGANDAROV AND OTHERS
08/07/2010
08/10/2010
18696/08
ISMAYILOVA
09/12/2010
09/03/2011
17276/07
JAFAROV
11/02/2010
11/05/2010
35507/07
SAFAROVA
14/10/2010
14/01/2011
25315/08
YUSIFOVA
18/12/2012
18/12/2012
56547/10
ZULFALI HUSEYNOV
26/06/2012
26/09/2012
 
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
 
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the non-enforcement of final domestic decisions entailing various obligations and the interference with the applicants’ property rights (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);
 
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
 
-          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
-          of general measures preventing similar violations;
 
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
 
Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
 
Considering that the question of individual measures in these cases has been resolved, given that the domestic court decisions in question have been enforced and the applicants’ property rights have been restored;
 
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Mirzayev, Humbatov and Tarverdiyev groups of cases and that the closure of these cases in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
 
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
 
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy