CASE OF ABIDOV AGAINST RUSSIA AND 19 OTHER CASES

Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)58
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Twenty cases against Russian Federation
 
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 March 2019
at the 1340th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
 
 
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
52805/10
ABIDOV
12/06/2012
12/09/2012
35692/11
ALIKHONOV
31/07/2012
31/10/2012
30225/11
BAKOYEV
05/02/2013
05/05/2013
38124/07
DZHURAYEV
17/12/2009
28/06/2010
66317/09
ELMURATOV
03/03/2011
15/09/2011
42443/02
EMINBEYLI
26/02/2009
26/05/2009
19316/09
GALEYEV
03/06/2010
03/09/2010
69235/11
K.
23/05/2013
23/08/2013
13476/04
KHUDYAKOVA
08/01/2009
08/04/2009
19732/04
KONONTSEV
29/07/2010
29/10/2010
70440/10
KOSHEVOY
13/06/2017
13/09/2017
60045/10
KOZHAYEV
05/06/2012
22/10/2012
77658/11
LATIPOV
12/12/2013
12/03/2014
656/06
NASRULLOYEV
11/10/2007
11/01/2008
27843/11
NIYAZOV
16/10/2012
16/01/2013
44882/07
NOVOSELOV
02/06/2005
10/01/2017
56662/09
OSHLAKOV
03/04/2014
03/07/2014
55822/10
SHAKUROV
05/06/2012
22/10/2012
16074/07
SHCHEBET
12/06/2008
12/09/2008
41970/11
SHCHERBINA
26/06/2014
17/11/2014
 
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
 
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of various irregularities concerning detention pending extradition (violations of Article 5 of the Convention);
 
Having regard also to the violations established in some of these cases related to poor conditions of detention on remand and in police custody, as well as inadequate medical treatment on remand (violations of Articles 3 of the Convention);
 
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
 
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
 
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
 
Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
 
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants are no longer detained pending extradition, on remand or in police custody;
 
Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Garabayev v. Russian Federation group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
 
Recalling also that the general measures required in response to the other violations found in some of these cases are examined by the Committee in the Kalashnikov group of cases;
 
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
 
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy